Original Title: Xinhua News Agency News: The moon lander developed by private companies in the United States landing in the moon.This is the first time that the United States spacecraft has been on the moon after more than 50 years.
Xinhua News Agency: The moon lander developed by the American "intuition machine" company "Odshus "landed in the moon on the 22nd of Eastern Time.This is the first time that the United States spacecraft has been on the moon after more than 50 years.(Reporter Tan Jingjing)
Previously reported:
The United States has been frustrated twice within a week in the United States, and has nothing to do with China.It is to find a problem from yourself ...
text | Maritime Passenger
January 9, local timeA company named "Aerospace Robot Technology" announced that due to the failure of the promotion system failure, the companys "peak" moon lander has been unable to land on the moon.Then, the National Aeronautics and Space Agency (NASA) announced that the "Artemis" manned moon landing plan was delayed.
NASAs space launch system and execute "Orion" spaceship "Orion 1" mission: NASA
There are domestic media to quote Reuters on January 12, "" The United States has suffered two setbacks in a successive lunar contest with China this week.There are risks of new strategies for private enterprises. "
Uncle Hai personally thinks-
This comments have the key to the criminal, but what is the U.S. moon boarding plan for hardshipsThe issue of competing with China is very meaningless and funny.After all, this comment also said, "As the only country in the United States has a tightening budget on the moon, it faces difficulties in inheriting its own cosmic heritage."Indeed, the United States realized the moon as early as the 1960s.The restart of the United States is at most inheriting its own inheritance and innovation.And China is just being exploring itself, and does not want to compete with the United States?
1
Indeed as some comments say, NASAs current moon landing plan, and some other spacesProjects are mostly cooperating with private companies.For example, Aerospace Robotics Technology Company sounds so tall, but people really have no number of tests!This is actually a private company.
Aerospace Robotics Technology Company released the update data of "Pengya" on X (formerly Twitter) on January 11
After the company informed that the public "Peragons" could not achieve soft landing in the moon, NASA confirmed it.
On January 11, local time, the aerospace robot technology company posted the update information of "Pengya" on X (Original Twitter), and said that although "Pengya" could not reach itThe moon is on the surface, but it is still collecting data in the last breath.It sounds tragic.
and NASA immediately confirmed this.
When many media speculate that "peaks" will soon become a space garbage that will be rolled with arbitrarily in space in space, the saying of aerospace robotics technology companies and NASA is nothing more than proved to prove that Eastern Time 1st time 1At 2:18 on the 8th, the "peak" launched from Florida Karnivilla Horn Space Base is still of its significance.
In fact, everyone understands, because it is impossibleThe task, so NASA The so -called US 50 The first plan to reach the moon surface has been aborted for the first time.
The abortion of the plan is considered by some people to be the failure of the national plan to cooperate with private enterprises.
Aerospace Robot Technology Company released the "Pengya" continued work on X (former Twitter) on January 11The picture
Why does "Pengya" fail?
Is the most direct reason is that the aerospace robot technology company belongs to a private company?In fact, this is not the case!
The most direct reason for its failure is nothing more than fuel leakage, which leads to a pusher failure!
Did all NASAs previous launch not encountered fuel leakage?In 2022, NASA claimed that the new generation of moon landing rocket was postponed because of fuel leakage!
Whether the private company is involved or not, isnt the decisive factor in whether the fuel will leak!
2
Some analysts blame the United States to cooperate with private companies because they think, NASA The reason why this is mainly to reduce costs.
Rad Whitk, a professor at Carnegie Mellon University, has led the development of a small four -wheel moon vehicle on the "Pealfa" lander.He frankly said that in the first moon landing mission of "Pengyu", there are many details that need to be paid attention to."You have 10,000 things must be done. In the process of performing tasks, it is very common and very common to encounter failure. The key question is how to exclude it as soon as possible."
It can also be seen from Whiteks statement that even if a private company such as Aerospace Robot Technology Co., Ltd. is actually not to add chaos to the US government, it also wants to do things well.After the launch of "Pengya", it cannot reach the moon surface map of the moon because of fuel leakage: Global Times
In fact, in the West, it is the existence of ancient existing in the cooperation between the country and the private company to conduct unknown areas.For example, Columbus discovered the new continent, which is so typical.Born in Genoa, Christopher Columbus was sent by the Spanish Queen Isabella I of Spain. He received the money of the Spanish royal family and recruited sailors and sailed away.To some extent, Columbus and his maritime team are a private company that cooperates with the Spanish royal family.
So, did the Spanish kings navy not levy in person in order to save funds?Obviously this is not the case.One major reason is that for the pioneering of unknown areas, it is necessary to explorers. For the Spanish army at the time, the main purpose of its existence was to protect the country and the expansion of the country.
Thinking from this logic, whether it is the aerospace robot technology company, or Musks space exploration company, it has its practical significance.
3
Someone is asking why China does not also engage in some private space companies, and with the country with the countryWhat about cooperation?
In fact, China also has some commercial aerospace companies.Some have become members of the International Aerospace Federation (IAF), some have launched self-developed sub-orbital rockets, and some have completed the 20-ton "Thunder-R1" to repeat the engine ...
To sum up, in terms of space exploration, compared with the United States, China is a latecomer and there are many places to learn from the United States.
Including how to make private enterprises also join the space exploration, China can learn from some of the United States experience and learn some lessons in the United States.
If some Western media touched Sino -US competition, including Sino -US space competition, it will inevitably become a rhetoric that sounds more like a joke.
In June 2021, Nelson talked about space plans at NASA headquarters
It is reported that NASA Director Nelson acknowledged that "China has a very positive plan" after announcing the postponing "Artemis" plan.The report also quoted Nelsons words: "I think they want to land before us, because this may bring them some benefits of propaganda."
Uncle Hai wants to sayThe Chinese space exploration plan has not actually closed the door to cooperation with other households, and it is not for the "benefit of propaganda."The words of Nelson sound like a taste of getting married!
China thought is the community of human destiny.It is not to say that in all aspects, we must only go beyond the United States in all aspects.
Nelsons words sound more like a mouthful of American society, but there is no comment and precise.
The United States cannot be nervous because China has its own lunar exploration plan.The United States has been frustrated twice within a week in the United States, and has nothing to do with China.It is still necessary to find a problem from yourself ...
Only in this way can we continue to stand on the human world with the face of the aerospace country!
