A collective litigation allegations The company carried out false propaganda, saying that the explosion of the first generation of AirPods Pro violated Apples marketing commitment.The collective lawsuit named "Labella et al." Apple Company "was submitted to the District Court of the North District of California, California on November 1st, claiming that Apple has a narrative error when selling high -quality audio of AirPods Pro.The lawsuit is 51 pages, claiming that the audio problem of personal audio accessories directly violates the quality statement.
ClassAction.org earlier reported the lawsuit, which discussed how consumers complained about the a few months after the release of AirPods Pro.There is a problem of explosion in use.The severity of these problems is enough to allow Apple to launch the after -sales plan for the affected products produced before October 2020.
However, the lawsuit insists that it is not only the users of the initial production equipment, but in fact all the first generation of AirPods Pro has problems.It is said that Apple has realized that this problem will affect more users, so it is said to extend the service plan and extend the service period of AirPods to three years after the first sales.
Apples own support document explanation says that in some cases, users may hear the burst or static sound, and at the same time active noise reduction failure occurs.This includes using AirPods Pro in a noisy environment, or using AirPods Pro during exercise or calling.
The lawsuit also said that if you know these problems in advance, customers will either avoid buying AirPods Pro or spend less money to buy.Therefore, the first generation of AirPods Pro is not worthy of consumers to pay for their high prices, because they have audio defects, which is inconsistent with Apples advertising, and Apple does not notify the existence of the first -generation model buyers.
Calculating claims include accusing Apples violation of California law, Ohio law, Texas law and Pennsylvana law, which violates the "Song-Bellyli consumers warrantyLaw, "Consumer Consumer Law Remedy Law", "California State UNUHAC" and "Consumer Protection Law".
In the "Rebuilding Request", the lawsuit requires Apple to compensate for the loss of losses to the plaintiff and collective members, the interest before and after the verdict, repair and replace the affected AirPods Pro devices, and the lawyer feeEssence
